More to Come...

Newchurch Now Butt of Cartoons

(Article used from WWW.TRADITIO.COM)
From: Fr. Moderator

Characters in the New BBC Cartoon Sitcom Popetown
The World Is Coming to Appreciate that the New Order
Is a Comedy not Divine

The world is becoming more and more aware of the fact that the New Order is not to be taken seriously, but should be the butt of comedy. So the British Broadcasting Corporation has produced a cartoon sitcom, Popetown, modeled after Bevis and Butthead, to portray the silliness of Newvatican and its minions. Starring are a less-than-charming pope and corrupt cardinals.

The Novus Ordinarians have called the cartoon comedy "offensive and nothing more than an intolerant derision of Catholic beliefs." We beg to differ. These are not Catholic beliefs; they are Newchurch beliefs. Turnabout is fair play. The Novus Ordiniarians stole the true Church and re-engineered it into a farce, so they can hardly complain when their religious crime is pointed out and satirized.

The Novus Ordo service is a joke, not a Mass. The Newchurch hierarchy has sunk into persistent corruption and crime, which is only getting worse. Church doctrine is now going to be "run" by an archbishop who panders to "gay rights." Solemn processes such as canonization have been turned into a joke, reliant upon politics and P.R. rather than religion.

What do these Novus Ordinarians expect?

Footnotes:

(1)   Novas Ordo – Latin for New Order a reference to the heretics who are trying to take over the Catholic Church with the new English liturgy and other changes in the beliefs of the Church.

(2) Another term for that part of the Catholic Church which has been taken over by heretics.

**************************************

BITS AND PIECES FOUR……

A STATEMENT TAKEN FROM WWW.TRADITIO.COM
( WWW.TRADITIO.COM is one of the largest web pages in the world and carries ALL of the news concerning the Catholic Church and its affairs, if you want to really see what is happening check it out)

Dear Fr. Moderator:
I agree with all that is said by our beloved Pope St. Pius V and agree that the Novus Ordo(1) is not Catholic, but help me -- I have been told that a pope can overturn another pope's ruling and that this is what JPII has done; that no one pope can bind a future pope. Help clarify, please.

Fr. Moderator Replies.
This is a false line that the Novus Ordo (1) tries to put over as an excuse for destroying the true Mass and substituting a Protestant service. All popes are sworn in fact and by virtue of the office of the papacy to be the guardians of Sacred Tradition. They have no authority to change it. Otherwise, they set themselves above Christ and become blasphemers.

In accidental matters, of course, a positive law can be changed. For example, the pope can increase the number of cardinals (whether it be wise or not). However, in essential matters, all popes are supposed to be serving the same Tradition and can certainly bind for the future.

For example, Pope Pius IX defined the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception in 1854 and bound the whole Church to it as a matter of dogma. Could his successor Pope Leo XIII rescind that dogma? Of course not.

Another example: Pope St. Pius V formally defined the precedential rite of Holy Mass, the Mass of the Roman Rite, and the rite of the Apostolic See, handed down from St. Peter in accordance with Sacred Tradition. Can some future pope rescind that decree pertaining to the central doctrine and practice of the Church, and substitute some "New Mass" outside of Apostolic Tradition? Of course not.

Moreover, every doctrinal decree of twenty oecumenical councils, which after all must be promulgated by a pope, is certainly binding on the future. Could a modern pope rescind the doctrinal decrees of the Council of Nicaea, from which we get the Nicene Creed? Of course not!

It appears that you are speaking to one of those "lay theologians," who speak about matters they do not understand. Next time someone tells you that a pope cannot bind a future pope; you can tell him he's dead wrong. Popes are subservient to the Deposit of Faith, Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition, and have no authority to change it. If he doesn't accept that point, tell him that it is a dogma defined at Vatican I and that if he denies that doctrine, he's a heretic.

---- + ----

A (so-called) Catholic priest blesses a sex show (Hooters)

No surprise here. Considering how deeply the heretic clergy in the Catholic Church have sold their souls to the flesh, why would they not bless sex shows? So now we find that the head Heretic Catholic presbyter, Msgr. Isidore Rozychki, will bless a new Hooters restaurant in Waco, Texas. And who's outraged? Not the Novus Ordinarians -- but the Protestants. At least their moral beacon is straight on this one.

We will have to call the heretics who currently control most of the Catholic Churches “The New Church”. (Novus in Latin) If we can even consider it a Church!!!.

The national restaurant chain, named after the fact that the "hooters" of the waitresses are exposed to titillate the clientele. Ruddy Rozycki justifies the blessing as follows: "You bless the building so it will be a safe haven, so that the families that enter will be blessed." So Rozycki considers a sex palace a suitable place for families! Rozycki's reply: "It's a fun place.... It's great food."

In New church (2), which is supposed to be so oecumenical these days, Rozycki has drawn fire from local religious leaders. About 60 local ministers signed a letter this fall in which they expressed their disapproval of the restaurant. They said they oppose Hooters because it exploits women and bases its marketing campaign on sexual innuendo. But Ruddy Rozycki wants to "reach out and serve the community." (He doesn't explain exactly how exposing children, or even adults for that matter, serves the community.)
We're still waiting for Newchurch bishop Gregory Aymond to issue his papers of termination of Ruddy Rozycki. We expect to be disappointed. Probably Aymond will be personally present at the Hooters opening!

--- + ---
Presbyter Whistleblower Disappears; Vatican Foul-play Suspected
From: Fr. Moderator

A Tight-lipped Keith Cardinal O'Brien, of Scotland Refused to Deny that Ratzinger Threatened Him to Silence a Presbyter Who Blew the Whistle on Newchurch Sex Crimes in Scotland. If anyone doubts that that Newrome has become a mafia, all one has to do is observe what has happened to Novus Ordo presbyters who have publicly blown the whistle on Newchurch crimes.

TRADITIO reported earlier on the case of Newchurch presbyter Andrew Dowgiert, of Miami, who has sued the archdiocese on for wrongly firing him, for slander, and for whistle-blower retaliation when he blew the whistle about financial improprieties and rampant homosexual activity and fraud by another presbyter in the archdiocese.
In another case in Boston, the vice rector of the diocesan seminary, who blew the whistle to his Newchurch bishop that there were immoralities going on at the seminary, was illegally committed to a mental hospital. The court freed the presbyter, who subsequently sued the archdiocese for millions.

Now Presbyter Steven Gilhooley, who wrote an book entitled The Pygama Parada on the sex abuse he suffered while growing up in a Edinburgh seminary has disappeared. In 2001, Presbyter Francis Bligh (what an appropriate name!) was jailed for two and a half years and placed on the sex offenders' register for life on ten counts of crime.

Some suspect foul-play against Gilhooley on the part of the Newvatican, since in his last public statement before disappearing, Gilhooley criticized the appointment as pope of Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, whom he accused of trying to silence him. As previously reported on TRADITIO, Ratzinger, now Benedict XVI, had a bad record as Prefect of the Doctrine of the Faith in attempting to silence Newchurch clergy who publicly expose crimes on the part of the Newchurch bishops and presbyters.

Gilhooley claimed in the book, which graphically described the abuse and brutal regime he suffered while growing up at the seminary, had provoked the wrath of Newvatican. He stated: "I went public [over the abuse] at great personal cost to myself, and reported my abuser to the police. He was given a jail sentence. Led by Cardinal Ratzinger, Rome's response was to deliver a threat to my archbishop [Keith Cardinal O'Brien] that if he didn't silence me, they'd discipline him. I was treated as the perpetrator rather than the victim." [Edinburgh Scotsman] Archbishop O'Brien declined to comment on the claim that he had been pressured by Cardinal Ratzinger to keep Gilhooley quiet. Hmmm. It appears that neither the Newchurch bishops nor Newrome nor the pope have changed their pattern of criminal complicity in sex crimes and embezzlement. They are just a morally rotten now as they were some five or more years ago when the Newchurch Great Sex and Embezzlement Scandal came to public light.

The moral culpability goes to the very top. Certainly JPII, far from the picture of a saint, abetted the crimes by silence and inaction. Now we found out that Benedict-Ratzinger tried to silence whistle-blowing Newchurch clergy and threatened archbishops to keep them silent. Why does none of this corruption in Newchurch surprise us?